This research titled addresses the inefficiencies and lack of transparency associated with the manual auctioning process of surplus government assets. The system was developed as a web-based platform using HTML, CSS, PHP, and MySQL, aiming to streamline the auctioning process, enhance public participation, and promote accountability. Key features of the system include user registration, real-time bidding, secure payment processing, and an administrative dashboard for auction management. Through an extensive review of online auction systems and their application in government agencies, the project emphasizes the importance of transparency, accountability, and security in auction platforms. System testing demonstrated the platform's effectiveness in meeting its objectives, providing a user-friendly and efficient alternative to traditional methods. This solution significantly improves the auctioning process, fostering public trust and ensuring better asset disposal management. The project also provides recommendations for continuous monitoring, user training, and the integration of advanced features to enhance the system's functionality and adaptability in the future.

Keywords: Transparency, Auction, Dashboard, Application, Administrative, Accountability, Streamline, Registration, Integration, Training.

[1] Cassady, R. (2020). History and practice of auction systems. University of California Press, 6: 74–80.

[2] Public Sector Modernization Report (2023). Digital transformation in government asset disposal. World Governance Institute Journal, 7: 12–15.

[3] Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2022). The drawbacks of traditional paper-based systems. Journal of Administrative Efficiency, 18: 45–50.

[4] Government e-Procurement Journal (2019). The shift to digital: Transparency and governance in asset disposal. Government E-Journal Publishing, 4: 55–62.

[5] Kashyap, S., & Sharma, M. (2020). Security implementation in e-auction systems. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 20: 101–106.

[6] Turban, E., King, D., Lee, J.K., Warkentin, M., & Chung, H.M. (2021). Electronic commerce: A managerial and social networks perspective. Springer Texts in Business and Economics, 14: 256–260.

[7] O'Brien, J.A., & Marakas, G.M. (2020). Management information systems. McGraw-Hill Education, 11: 230–235.

[8] Prasad, J., & Lasya, B. (2025). AI-driven auction platform: A comprehensive system for user, auction, payment and review management. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 9: 67–72. https:// doi.org/10.33564/ijeast.2025.v09i11.011.

[9] Sommerville, I. (2021). Software engineering. Pearson Education, 11: 80–85.

[10] Laudon, K.C., & Laudon, J.P. (2024). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm. Pearson Education, 18: 510–515.

[11] Ugah, J.O., Aniji, I.V., Chizoba, C.E., Offiah, I., & Ajuka, G.E. (2025). AI-driven software optimization: Integrating reinforcement learning, deep learning and evolutionary computation for improved performance and reliability. Asian Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 9: 1.

Source of Funding:

This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing Interests Statement:

The authors declare that they have no competing interests related to this work.

Consent for publication:

The authors declare that they consented to the publication of this study.

Authors' contributions:

All the authors made an equal contribution in the Conception and design of the work, Data collection, Drafting the article, and Critical revision of the article.

Ethical Approval:

Not applicable for this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement:

Not applicable for this study.

Informed Consent:

Not applicable for this study.